Home arrow Latest news arrow US telcos will win their franchise battle and increase video competition - ABI Research Thursday, 20 November 2008
Advertisement
 
Home
Latest news
Features
Videos
White papers & reports
Contact us
About IPTV News
Advertising with IPTV News
IPTV training
IPTV News Analyst
Industry jobs
Events
IPTV World Series Awards
Events

iptvwf09_button_125x125.gif


iptvla09_banner_125x125.gif

Latest News
 

US telcos will win their franchise battle and increase video competition - ABI Research

May 30th, 2006 - The four-way battles now raging in the United States around the question of municipal, state, or national franchise agreements for telco video services will see the telcos ultimately prevail over cable operators and local governments, according to new analysis from ABI Research. "That will mean an accelerated deployment of IPTV video services to customers, and increased sales of set-top boxes," says the New York-based research group.

"We are at the cusp of a strong run-up in IPTV subscriber bases over the next year or two," says principal analyst Michael Arden. "The telcos have sympathy at the higher levels of government, and in general the principles of encouraging competition and preventing monopoly mean that the telcos will be victorious in this battle. It's just a question of when."

ABI Research explains that under FCC regulations, local governments can require video operators active in their areas to conclude franchise agreements and pay fees. Cable companies have had to complete agreements with every small municipality.

Telcos, arguing that their offerings are not video services but broadband services that happen to have video features, have tried to avoid that arduous process. Now, they are increasingly getting relief in the form of initiatives in several states to grant state-wide franchises. Texas, Colorado, Louisiana, South Carolina and New Jersey, among others, have passed, or are considering, legislation setting up state-wide franchises, and a proposal for a federal version has been put forward.

"Local governments and cable operators oppose these moves. Their reasons include the obvious: revenue lost to the municipalities and greater competition for the cable companies. But both groups cite an apparently altruistic fear as well. They allege that the telcos will 'cherry-pick' the most affluent neighbourhoods for their IPTV, where customers would be more likely to buy premium channels, VOD, network PVR and other high-priced services, leaving less prosperous communities further disadvantaged."

Such selectivity is not permitted under equal access provisions of the law, and telcos deny any such intention. However, notes Arden, when AT&T was initially planning its IPTV deployments, it based much of its market selection strategy on which markets would generate the highest ARPU.

ABI Research has published a wide range of materials on IPTV, the latest updates being 'Telco TV Market Update: Operators' Aggressive Rollouts Prepare Market for Wide Telco TV Adoption', and 'Telco TV Forecast Database'.

 
< Prev   Next >
 

informa_web.jpg

IPTV World Forum Eastern Europe 08



IPTV World Series events

Free newsletter
*  Your email address:
*  Preferred Format:
*  Enter the security code:

iptv---125x125.gif 

Polls
What is the biggest single challenge IPTV operators face?
 
How many IPTV subscribers will there be globally by 2010?
 

Publications

iptv_3e_120x120.gif

odtv_6e_120x120.gif

global-net-tv-ad-120x120.gif

 

Syndicate

Terms & Conditions Disclaimer

Monitor Pro Solutions