New study claims content theft big business

Content theft sites made nearly a quarter of a billion dollars last year from advertising on rip-off sites, according to a new report from the Digital Citizens Alliance.  According to the study, the thirty largest sites that profit exclusively from advertising dollars by pushing stolen movies, music, and television programs will each make more than $4 million dollars a year for their ‘work.’

“Ad profits are the tip of the iceberg,” says Digital Citizens Alliance Executive Director Tom Galvin about the report. “These ad-supported rip-off websites are just a small sample of the sites that are profiting from theft, and with the Internet population growing so quickly we need to address this problem immediately.  Let’s be clear, the quarter of a billion dollars that these sites make from ads in a year is a huge sum, but it’s only a fraction of the financial losses inflicted on the creative economy and its workers.  This goes beyond the old adage that crime pays.”

The report, entitled, ”Good Money Gone Bad: Digital Thieves and the Hijacking of the Online Ad Business,” examined hundreds of content theft sites that featured advertising.  The research shows that a significant number of ads on these sites come from premium and secondary legitimate brand advertisers.  Secondary ads are non-premium legitimate ads, mostly for legitimate gaming, gambling and content aggregator sites.

The report came to several troubling conclusions:

  • The websites researched make a projected $227 million in annual ad revenue.  The 30 largest sites that profit exclusively from advertising averaged $4.4 million annually, with the most heavily trafficked BitTorrent and P2P portal sites topped $6 million annually.
  • Even small sites studied could make more than $100,000 a year in advertising revenue.
  • Because they rely entirely on the works of others for their “product,” their profit margins range from 80% to 94%, underscoring that crime can pay when you steal other people’s content.
  • Nearly 30% of large sites carried premium brand ads.
  • Nearly 40% of large sites carried legitimate secondary ads.

“This report confirms that content theft isn’t a cottage industry—it’s big business.  Plain and simple, ad-supported rip-off sites are exploiting the Internet and advertising community to get rich.  The result is a damage to brand value for advertisers and serious harm to people who work in the creative industries,” said Galvin. “We hope this report pushes the online advertising community to take additional steps to protect brand value and stop ads from appearing on content theft sites that are undermining the vibrancy and safety of the digital marketplace.”




We welcome reader discussion and request that you please comment using an authentic name. Comments will appear on the live site as soon as they are approved by the moderator (within 24 hours). Spam, promotional and derogatory comments will not be approved

Post your comment

Facebook, Instagram and Sky case study: Game of Thrones

BT at IBC: 'unlocking the power of fibre IPTV'

IP&TV News tries out 4G Broadcast at the FA Cup Final

Thomas Riedl: “Google TV has evolved into Android TV”

Tesco and blinkbox: what went wrong?

Reed Hastings and 2030: is he right?