Aereo faces unclear future after FilmOn X injunction

Online content provider Aereo could face an uncertain future after a federal court in Washington DC granted a preliminary injunction against another provider, FilmOn X, brought by US broadcasters.

ABC, NBC and Fox TV had argued that FilmOn X was “violating their exclusive right to public performance of their copyrighted works, which include local programs and some of the country’s most popular evening television shows”.

District Court Judge Rosemary M. Collyer ruled that FilmOnX’s service violates copyright laws. “The court finds that the provisions of the 1976 [Telecommunications] Act that protect plaintiffs work are clear,” she wrote.

Judge Collyer rejected FilmOn X’s argument that its thousands of mini antennas, each tied to an individual subscriber – like Aereo’s service – mean the company is not retransmitting a broadcaster’s signal.

In a statement issued after the hearing, Fox said: “We are pleased, but not surprised, that the court recognised that the commercial retransmission of our broadcast signal without permission or compensation is a clear violation of the law. This decision should finally put the matter to rest, and will hopefully discourage other illegal services from attempting to steal our content.”

Like Aereo, FilmOn X retransmits local TV programming over the internet without paying broadcasters.

It broadcasts 200 live TV channels, along with 500 video and audio podcasts from brands.

Tags: ,

We welcome reader discussion and request that you please comment using an authentic name. Comments will appear on the live site as soon as they are approved by the moderator (within 24 hours). Spam, promotional and derogatory comments will not be approved

Post your comment

Facebook, Instagram and Sky case study: Game of Thrones

BT at IBC: 'unlocking the power of fibre IPTV'

IP&TV News tries out 4G Broadcast at the FA Cup Final

Thomas Riedl: “Google TV has evolved into Android TV”

Tesco and blinkbox: what went wrong?

Reed Hastings and 2030: is he right?